A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ABDULLA QAHHOR AND ERNEST HEMINGWAY'S SHORT STORIES

Abstract

This comparative analysis examines the short stories of Abdulla Qahhor and Ernest Hemingway, two towering figures in their respective literary traditions. The study reveals that while both authors are united by a foundational commitment to realism, humanism, and the subtle portrayal of characters' inner lives, their thematic and stylistic approaches diverge significantly. Qahhor’s narratives are deeply rooted in social critique, focusing on societal injustices, economic hardship, and the external struggles of ordinary Uzbek people. In contrast, Hemingway’s works explore existential realities, grappling with mortality, the impact of war, and the internal battles of the “Lost Generation”. This thematic split is mirrored in their narrative styles: Qahhor’s prose uses witty, culturally resonant language and proverbs for direct social commentary, while Hemingway's "Iceberg Principle" employs omission and understatement to compel readers to infer unspoken truths. Ultimately, both authors achieve a lasting literary legacy by using their specific historical and cultural contexts to illuminate universal human experiences.